On Tue, 27 May 2025 07:45:35 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Does SonarCloud scan source code or class files? I'm wondering if there is
> anything to feedback to them on this report.
I think both. But as I said, I misunderstood the report: it tells me we are
using a boxed `Boolean`, likely unnecess
On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:08:45 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> SonarCloud complains that since
> [JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356080) we are using
> `Boolean` boxes in `ReverseOrderListView`. This change `boolean` -> `Boolean`
> was made in [JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk
On Mon, 26 May 2025 19:01:35 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> How is this an allocation? I examined `javap -c -p -v
> java.util.ReverseOrderListView` and confirmed this compiles to
> `Boolean.valueOf` in class files, which involves no new allocation.
Yeah, I brain-fogged a little here. Still, it makes
On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:08:45 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> SonarCloud complains that since
> [JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356080) we are allocating
> and using `Boolean` boxes in `ReverseOrderListView`. This change `boolean` ->
> `Boolean` was made in
> [JDK-8356080](ht
On Mon, 26 May 2025 17:08:45 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> SonarCloud complains that since
> [JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356080) we are allocating
> and using `Boolean` boxes in `ReverseOrderListView`. This change `boolean` ->
> `Boolean` was made in
> [JDK-8356080](ht
SonarCloud complains that since
[JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356080) we are allocating
and using `Boolean` boxes in `ReverseOrderListView`. This change `boolean` ->
`Boolean` was made in
[JDK-8356080](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8356080) to allow `@Stable`
folding
