On Mon, 5 May 2025 18:59:29 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry
>> for Lookup.findGetter.
>
> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes th
On Mon, 5 May 2025 18:59:29 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry
>> for Lookup.findGetter.
>
> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes th
On Mon, 5 May 2025 18:59:29 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry
>> for Lookup.findGetter.
>
> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes th
On Mon, 5 May 2025 18:59:29 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry
>> for Lookup.findGetter.
>
> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes th
On Sun, 4 May 2025 17:01:54 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Thanks for the mailing list communication and reply.
>
> Check out https://openjdk.org/guide/ for more steps. For example, a patch
> should usually wait 24 hours for sufficient reviews.
@liach Thanks for the fast review and the creation of th
On Sun, 4 May 2025 17:20:29 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Nit: Would be nice if the PR title/description made it clear for the casual
> reader that this is a documentation/Javadoc typo, as opposed to a code issue.
Thanks for the hint. I've updated the PR accordingly.
> This gives reviewers som
> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry for
> Lookup.findGetter.
Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull req
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:45:11 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
> This PR fixes a typo in the bytecode cast for Lookup.findGetter.
Just a tip for a newcomer: (Welcome!)
It may be useful to flag this PR as “trivial” and “documentation-only” by
saying something like “Please review this trivial, document
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:45:11 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
> This PR fixes a typo in the bytecode cast for Lookup.findGetter.
Nit: Would be nice if the PR title/description made it clear for the casual
reader that this is a documentation/Javadoc typo, as opposed to a code issue.
-
PR
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:45:11 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
> This PR fixes a typo in the bytecode cast for Lookup.findGetter.
Thanks for the mailing list communication and reply.
Check out https://openjdk.org/guide/ for more steps. For example, a patch
should usually wait 24 hours for sufficient
This PR fixes a typo in the bytecode cast for Lookup.findGetter.
-
Commit messages:
- 8356119: Correct field type for bytecode cast
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25024/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=25024&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.o
11 matches
Mail list logo
