On Fri, 2 May 2025 05:19:57 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
>> propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
>> facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
>> MethodType.fromDescriptorStr
On Thu, 1 May 2025 00:01:08 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
> propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
> facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
> MethodType.fromDescriptorString.
On Thu, 1 May 2025 00:01:08 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
> propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
> facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
> MethodType.fromDescriptorString.
On Fri, 2 May 2025 04:56:51 GMT, Shaojin Wen wrote:
>> As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
>> propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
>> facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
>> MethodType.fromDescriptorStr
On Thu, 1 May 2025 00:01:08 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
> propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
> facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
> MethodType.fromDescriptorString.
As another step toward the removal of the old generics infrastructure, I
propose to remove the usages of generic parsing utilities and use the
facilities provided by BytecodeDescriptor, already used by
MethodType.fromDescriptorString. This also prevents extra validation cost in
use sites to def
