On Wed, 21 May 2025 21:31:16 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Wed, 21 May 2025 21:31:16 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Wed, 21 May 2025 21:31:39 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> I have appened this teaching paragraph also as a blockquote inlined note
>> after this current paragraph.
>
> This unnecessary detail goes will beyond the description of the annotation
> and is more of a design doc for VM implementation so
On Fri, 16 May 2025 19:45:16 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
> Or just: s/, unlike the other methods//
Removed mention of "the other methods".
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
> line 90:
>
>> 88: * intrinsic.) For example, the documentation can simply
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
On Wed, 21 May 2025 21:28:07 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
>> line 90:
>>
>>> 88: * intrinsic.) For example, the documentation can simply say that the
>>> result is
>>> 89: * undefined if a race happens. However, ra
On Wed, 21 May 2025 20:11:39 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
>> line 50:
>>
>>> 48: * For example, the bytecodes of a candidate method may be executed by
>>> lower
>>> 49: * compilation tiers of VM execution, while high
On Tue, 20 May 2025 06:08:37 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional
>> commits
On Tue, 20 May 2025 06:07:07 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
>> line 47:
>>
>>> 45: * intrinsics necessary.
>>> 46: *
>>> 47: * Intrinsification may never happen, or happen at any moment during
>>> execution.
>>
>>
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:30 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:30 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Fri, 16 May 2025 19:55:58 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains eight additional
>> commits s
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:30 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:26:30 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:12:29 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:12:29 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:57:19 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:58:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 20:58:21 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:01:13 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In the new design, the above "footnotes" go at the bottom. They explain why
>> the rules prescribed at the top are important. In effect, inform aggressive
>> implementors how far they may bend those rules. Sometimes the rules do get
>>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:42:01 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
>> And for arrays, a footnote might be appropriate:
>>
>>
>>
>> For some highly optimized algorithms, it may be impractical to ensure that
>> array
>> data is read or written only once by the intrinsic. If the caller of the
>> intrinsic
>
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:12:19 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:38:42 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
>> line 58:
>>
>>> 56: * The HotSpot VM checks, when loading a class, the consistency of
>>> recognized
>>> 57: * methods and {@code @IntrinsicCandidate} ann
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:23:52 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Refine validation and defensive copying
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/vm/annotation/IntrinsicCandidate.java
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 20:12:19 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
>> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
>> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
>> shrink
> In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation
> does not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever
> can be done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to
> shrink a "TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as
In offline discussion, we noted that the documentation on this annotation does
not recommend minimizing the intrinsified section and moving whatever can be
done in Java to Java; thus I prepared this documentation update, to shrink a
"TLDR" essay to something concise for readers, such as pointing
31 matches
Mail list logo
