On Thu, 1 May 2025 17:26:48 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Note, the timeout factor also adjusts the jtreg timeout for the entire test.
>> The adjustTimeout() method allows internal test timeouts to scale along with
>> the jtreg timeout.
>
>> Hi Joe, yes `adjustTimeout` will scale based on the jtreg
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:24:53 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote:
>> Hi Joe, yes `adjustTimeout` will scale based on the jtreg timeout factor. I
>> believe the behaviour is to multiply whatever hardcoded timeout is passed by
>> the timeout factor.
>> On lower tiers, in our CI, I beleive it means the test w
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:37:07 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
>> factor in higher tiers.
>
> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Removing test
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:37:07 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
>> factor in higher tiers.
>
> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Removing test
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:53:14 GMT, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock5.java line 127:
>>
>>> 125: // in higher tiers, so it's necessary to be a bit pessimistic
>>> here.
>>> 126: private final static Duration JOIN_WAIT =
>>> 127: Dur
On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 19:05:54 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Removing test from the problem list.
>
> test/jdk/java/util/logging/LoggingDeadlock5.java line 127:
>
>> 125: /
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:37:07 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
>> factor in higher tiers.
>
> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Removing test
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:37:07 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
>> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
>> factor in higher tiers.
>
> David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Removing test
> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
> factor in higher tiers.
David Beaumont has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Removing test from the problem list.
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:12:14 GMT, David Beaumont wrote:
> Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout
> factor in higher tiers.
Hard to tell whether 1s would be enough. I'd be tempted to bump that up.
You should also take the test out of the problem list.
--
Increasing timeout for deadlock detection and adjusting for the timeout factor
in higher tiers.
-
Commit messages:
- Increasing timeout for deadlock detection.
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24687/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24687&range=00
11 matches
Mail list logo
