On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 12:07:45 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat pr
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problematic - JLine is
> very powerful, possibly too powerfu
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problematic - JLine is
> very powerful, possibly too powerfu
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:28:17 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat pr
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:54:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problem
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:22:45 GMT, David M. Lloyd wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewha
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:12:54 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat pro
On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:59:52 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat pro
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problematic - JLine is
> very powerful, possibly too powerfu
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 11:18:14 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> src/jdk.internal.le/share/classes/jdk/internal/console/SimpleConsoleReader.java
>> line 75:
>>
>>> 73: }
>>> 74: continue READ;
>>> 75: case '\033':
>>
>> If this is meant to be platfo
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 20:48:22 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> src/jdk.internal.le/share/classes/jdk/internal/console/SimpleConsoleReader.java
>> line 198:
>>
>>> 196:
>>> 197: if (it.hasNext()) {
>>> 198: out.append("\n\r");
>>
>> I understand this is a simple console, bu
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:54:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problem
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:04:55 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> src/jdk.internal.le/share/classes/jdk/internal/console/SimpleConsoleReader.java
>> line 69:
>>
>>> 67: case 4: break READ; //EOF/Ctrl-D
>>> 68: case 127:
>>> 69: //backspace:
>>
>> Is it
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 12:43:26 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a som
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:54:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problem
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:29:29 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat pr
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:54:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problem
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:59:39 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
>> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
>> and one for JShell.
>>
>> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 08:55:09 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> Can you coordinate with Naoto on this? There is a CSR in progress to switch
> Console back to using the java.base implementation by default.
Right - but that still keeps the existing JLine-based provider, and so the
problems it has still
The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a more
convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine) and one
for JShell.
The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problematic - JLine is
very powerful, possibly too powerful and comple
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 07:54:48 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> The `java.io.Console` has several backends: a simple on in `java.base`, a
> more convenient one in `jdk.internal.le` (with line-reading based on JLine)
> and one for JShell.
>
> The backend based on JLine is proving to be a somewhat problem
21 matches
Mail list logo
