Re: RFR: 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java [v3]

2025-07-02 Thread Takuya Kiriyama
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:29:43 GMT, Takuya Kiriyama wrote: >> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does >> not fully check some important cases. >> >> Issue Details: >> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to >> different loggi

Re: RFR: 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java [v3]

2025-07-01 Thread Roger Riggs
On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 10:29:43 GMT, Takuya Kiriyama wrote: >> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does >> not fully check some important cases. >> >> Issue Details: >> The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to >> different loggi

Re: RFR: 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java [v3]

2025-04-04 Thread KIRIYAMA Takuya
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 18:39:22 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> I see. This test only takes a very short time, but shouldn't the cases be >> added? > > Still no, starting a new Java runtime isn't that quick, and it brings no > additional value. > All tests are run 10's of thousands of times in every re

Re: RFR: 8352016: Improve java/lang/RuntimeTests/RuntimeExitLogTest.java [v3]

2025-04-04 Thread KIRIYAMA Takuya
> The current test program for the logging feature added in JDK-8301627 does > not fully check some important cases. > > Issue Details: > The test does not properly check cases where logging might not happen due to > different logging levels. (e.g. ALL, TRACE, WARNING, etc.) > The check for the