On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:22:10 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
>> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
>
> Kim Barrett has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisio
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:22:10 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
>> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
>
> Kim Barrett has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revisio
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
Kim Barrett has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
bchristi-git review
-
Changes:
- all: ht
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:17:53 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
Changes requested by bchristi (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23952#pullr
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 19:57:23 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/ref/CleanerImpl.java line 142:
>>
>>> 140: // while there are registered cleanables for other
>>> objects.
>>> 141: // If the application cleans all remaining cleanab
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:14:23 GMT, Brent Christian wrote:
>> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
>> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/ref/CleanerImpl.java line 142:
>
>> 140: // w
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:17:53 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/ref/CleanerImpl.java line 142:
> 140: // while there ar
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:17:53 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
Marked as reviewed by shade (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23952#pullreq
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 23:17:53 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
> provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
Nice clear description. Thanks
-
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.
Please review this revision of a previously puzzling comment intending to
provide the rationale for a bit of non-obvious code.
-
Commit messages:
- improve comment
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23952/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23952&range=00
10 matches
Mail list logo