Re: RFR: 8347814: Make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and benchmarks

2025-04-29 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:11:30 GMT, Per Minborg wrote: > In the end, this didn't make the bar in terms of cost/benefit. For example, > backporting might be impacted. The first LTS release to include this API will be 25, correct? It would be best to clean this up in advance, as backporting to ver

Re: RFR: 8347814: Make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and benchmarks

2025-04-29 Thread Per Minborg
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:22:09 GMT, Per Minborg wrote: > This PR proposes to make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and > benchmarks. > > This is a follow-up PR from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22827 > > Passes tier1-3 In the end, this didn't make the bar in terms of cost/bene

Re: RFR: 8347814: Make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and benchmarks

2025-04-25 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:22:09 GMT, Per Minborg wrote: > This PR proposes to make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and > benchmarks. > > This is a follow-up PR from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22827 > > Passes tier1-3 test/jdk/java/foreign/TestFunctionDescriptor.java line 38:

RFR: 8347814: Make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and benchmarks

2025-02-19 Thread Per Minborg
This PR proposes to make all imports consistent in the FFM API tests and benchmarks. This is a follow-up PR from https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/22827 Passes tier1-3 - Commit messages: - Merge branch 'master' into fix-imports-tests - Fix copyright year - Fix imports Changes