Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding [v4]

2025-02-05 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
> Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-services` jlink option. The test compares > module lists from bot

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding [v3]

2025-02-05 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
> Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-services` jlink option. The test compares > module lists from bot

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding [v2]

2025-02-05 Thread Alexander Matveev
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:09:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: >> Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind >> services in app's runtime by default. >> >> The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink >> options and another with `--bind-ser

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding [v2]

2025-02-05 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 19:44:54 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: >> test/jdk/tools/jpackage/share/JLinkOptionsTest.java line 175: >> >>> 173: .setExecutable(cmd.appLauncherPath().toAbsolutePath()) >>> 174: .addArguments("--print-modules") >>> 175: .executeA

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding [v2]

2025-02-05 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
> Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-services` jlink option. The test compares > module lists from bot

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding

2025-02-05 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 03:25:46 GMT, Alexander Matveev wrote: >> Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind >> services in app's runtime by default. >> >> The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink >> options and another with `--bind-s

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding

2025-02-04 Thread Alexander Matveev
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:23:22 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: > Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-service

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding

2025-02-04 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:23:22 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: > Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-service

Re: RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding

2025-02-04 Thread Abdelhak Zaaim
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 21:23:22 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote: > Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind > services in app's runtime by default. > > The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink > options and another with `--bind-service

RFR: 8346434: Add test for non-automatic service binding

2025-02-04 Thread Alexey Semenyuk
Added a test case to JLinkOptionsTest to test that jpackage doesn't bind services in app's runtime by default. The test builds two app images for the same app. One with the default jlink options and another with `--bind-services` jlink option. The test compares module lists from both runtimes.