On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:09:33 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> The test was mistakenly put in a package as the library class it's testing.
> This is unnecessary since there is no internal field/method it needs access
> to.
Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.
The test was mistakenly put in a package as the library class it's testing.
This is unnecessary since there is no internal field/method it needs access to.
-
Commit messages:
- 8343549: SeededSecureRandomTest needn't be in a package
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21881/f