Re: RFR: 8343039: Remove jdk.internal.misc.InternalLock and usages from java.io [v7]

2024-11-14 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:18:03 GMT, ExE Boss wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/BufferedOutputStream.java line 89: >> >>> 87: >>> 88: if (getClass() == BufferedOutputStream.class) { >>> 89: // resizable if initialSize < maxSize >> >> I think the comment is confusin

Re: RFR: 8343039: Remove jdk.internal.misc.InternalLock and usages from java.io [v7]

2024-11-14 Thread ExE Boss
On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:59:47 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one >> additional commit since the last revision: >> >> 8343039: Remove failing getDeclaredField call from test >> java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java > > src/java.base/s

Re: RFR: 8343039: Remove jdk.internal.misc.InternalLock and usages from java.io [v7]

2024-11-14 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 21:39:54 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Uses of `InternalLock` are removed and `synchronized` is reinstated. > > Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > 8343039: Remove failing getDeclaredField

Re: RFR: 8343039: Remove jdk.internal.misc.InternalLock and usages from java.io [v7]

2024-11-14 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 21:39:54 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Uses of `InternalLock` are removed and `synchronized` is reinstated. > > Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > 8343039: Remove failing getDeclaredField

Re: RFR: 8343039: Remove jdk.internal.misc.InternalLock and usages from java.io [v7]

2024-11-13 Thread Brian Burkhalter
> Uses of `InternalLock` are removed and `synchronized` is reinstated. Brian Burkhalter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: 8343039: Remove failing getDeclaredField call from test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java - Ch