On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 19:39:52 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
>> Please review this PR which improves the readObject logic for
>> _j.text.MessageFormat_.
>>
>> No offset should be larger than the pattern length. We already ensure the
>> offsets when consumed backwards are equal/descending. The existing
> Please review this PR which improves the readObject logic for
> _j.text.MessageFormat_.
>
> No offset should be larger than the pattern length. We already ensure the
> offsets when consumed backwards are equal/descending. The existing
> first/initial check was off by 1 since it was checking a
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:14:05 GMT, Justin Lu wrote:
> Please review this PR which improves the readObject logic for
> _j.text.MessageFormat_.
>
> No offset should be larger than the pattern length. We already ensure the
> offsets when consumed backwards are equal/descending. The existing
> fir
Please review this PR which improves the readObject logic for
_j.text.MessageFormat_.
No offset should be larger than the pattern length. We already ensure the
offsets when consumed backwards are equal/descending. The existing
first/initial check was off by 1 since it was checking against the p
