On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:50:49 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 21:05:41 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I think it makes sense to include the version. I have no strong opinions on
> the format. Is the extract in the PR description updated with the latest
> version changes?
Yes, the description is updated with the output, and I've also
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:50:49 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:50:49 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not the `java` executable, but it is difficult find out a
