On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:17:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:28:33 GMT, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> About the version string: I think I first proposed including it. If we don't,
> then I think that `-version` ought to be in the shortlist of options we show
> here (not just in full help), so it doesn't become a _three_ step goose cha
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:17:13 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not the `java` executable, but it is difficult find out a
