On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:30:23 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> `shortVersionString` changed to `conciseVersionString` in:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21411/commits/e9e9ad4bdd0a11244cb1ef84fdeea036e94718c7
>
>> The idea behind printing the short version is to identify what tool is
>> speakin
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:55:56 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> So, just to double-check: given the request is to make the helps consistent,
>> and dropping the extensions from the concise help is not what was meant,
>> I'll add the extensions both here and to the ordinary help. Correct?
>
> Done here:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 15:34:16 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>>> @AlanBateman I'd like to respectfully disagree that this was an
>>> improvement. If consistency was the important objection here, maybe it
>>> would have been better to update "java -help" to include the .jar?
>>
>> I assume your disagree
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:04:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/launcher/resources/launcher.properties line
>> 241:
>>
>>> 239: \ -jar .jar to execute the main class of a JAR
>>> archive\n\
>>> 240: \ -m [/] to execute the main class of a module\n\
>>> 241:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:18:34 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> The idea behind printing the short version is to identify what tool is
>> speaking. It can be removed, if desired.
>
> `shortVersionString` changed to `conciseVersionString` in:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21411/commits/e9e9ad4bdd0
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:23:46 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>> commits sin
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:23:46 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>> commits sin
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:23:46 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>> commits sin
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 13:09:25 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> In passing, it may be better to pick "short" or "concise", right now it's a
>> mix in the method and resource keys.
>
> The idea behind printing the short version is to identify what tool is
> speaking. It can be removed, if desired.
`shor
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:25:57 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/sun/launcher/LauncherHelper.java line 598:
>>
>>> 596: static void printConciseUsageMessage(boolean printToStderr) {
>>> 597: initOutput(printToStderr);
>>> 598:
>>> ostream.println(SharedSe
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:13:18 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:16:25 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional
>> commits sin
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:13:18 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:13:18 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:13:18 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
>> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and
>> it feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run
>> JShell/REPL,
> Currently, running `java` without any parameters will lead to an output that
> is a full `--help`, which is over 100 lines (on my computer at least), and it
> feels overwhelming. And many people might actually want to run JShell/REPL,
> not the `java` executable, but it is difficult find out a
16 matches
Mail list logo
