On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 09:33:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > FWIW, there are more `@Stable` uses here: #19906
> > if you would have a moment to check that, it may be helpful. Thanks.
>
> That one looks fine: it is set outside of constructor, is intrinsically racy,
> and it has AFAICS the recov
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:30:34 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I was auditing the current uses of `@Stable` before relaxing its barriers
> ([JDK-8333791](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333791)), and this is an
> easy spot.
>
> `resolvedEnum` is not `final`. So technically publishing the ob
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:30:34 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I was auditing the current uses of `@Stable` before relaxing its barriers
> ([JDK-8333791](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333791)), and this is an
> easy spot.
>
> `resolvedEnum` is not `final`. So technically publishing the ob
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:30:34 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I was auditing the current uses of `@Stable` before relaxing its barriers
> ([JDK-8333791](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333791)), and this is an
> easy spot.
>
> `resolvedEnum` is not `final`. So technically publishing the ob
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 19:30:34 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I was auditing the current uses of `@Stable` before relaxing its barriers
> ([JDK-8333791](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333791)), and this is an
> easy spot.
>
> `resolvedEnum` is not `final`. So technically publishing the ob
I was auditing the current uses of `@Stable` before relaxing its barriers
([JDK-8333791](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333791)), and this is an
easy spot.
`resolvedEnum` is not `final`. So technically publishing the object via data
race can show `resolvedEnum` as `null`, which would bre
