On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:11:52 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1b1dba80](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1b1dba8082969244effa86ac03c6053b3b0ddc43)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:11:52 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1b1dba80](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1b1dba8082969244effa86ac03c6053b3b0ddc43)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:11:52 GMT, SendaoYan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1b1dba80](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1b1dba8082969244effa86ac03c6053b3b0ddc43)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[1b1dba80](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1b1dba8082969244effa86ac03c6053b3b0ddc43)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Pavel Rappo on 20 Jun 2024 and was
revi
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:56:45 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>>
>> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
>> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration
>> for which that new value
> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>
> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
> which that new value would still be insufficient, but we'll see.
>
> Aside from
> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>
> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
> which that new value would still be insufficient, but we'll see.
>
> Aside from
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:47:07 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> in the past on systems that Matthias has run into similar issues, it was
> observed that those systems run with a very high `-concurrency` value (which
> implies too many test processes running at the same time) which could cause
> slowne
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:05:15 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Looking briefly at this, I think we should be able to provide this as a
>> feature of jtreg's support of `junit` test itself. I've created
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/CODETOOLS-7903751 to investigate this
>> support in jtreg.
>
>
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:59:39 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/io/IO/IO.java line 192:
>>
>>> 190: // adapted from
>>> https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#extensions-lifecycle-callbacks-timing-extension
>>> 191:
>>> 192: public static class TimingExtension impleme
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 06:29:36 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Pavel Rappo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Disable timeout in expect scripts
>
> test/jdk/java/io/IO/IO.java line 192:
>
>> 190: // adapted from
>> https://j
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:02:30 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Preliminary testing on some affected configurations showed that even 20
> seconds might not be enough. Initially, I suggested that it would be hard to
> imagine, yet here we are.
I haven't seen the jtreg launch command or the jtr files for
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:06:23 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>>
>> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
>> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration
>> for which that new value
On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:01:49 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>>
>> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
>> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration
>> for which that new value
> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>
> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
> which that new value would still be insufficient, but we'll see.
>
> Aside from
> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>
> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
> which that new value would still be insufficient, but we'll see.
>
> Aside from
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 12:29:32 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
> Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
>
> On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
> insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
> which that new value would
Please review this fix for an intermittent test failure.
On some configurations, the default `expect` timeout of 10 seconds is
insufficient. It is increased to 20; it's hard to imagine a configuration for
which that new value would still be insufficient, but we'll see.
Aside from that, test-gen
18 matches
Mail list logo
