On Thu, 16 May 2024 21:36:03 GMT, Konstantin Nisht wrote:
>> @AlanBateman @DougLea Reviews are most welcome :)
>
> @viktorklang-ora We managed to reproduce it quite reliably by running the
> test from the bug report multiple times (in our case, it was 100). I
> understand this does not make a 1
On Mon, 20 May 2024 15:23:36 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem. Regression test added for JDK20+
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit
> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem. Regression test added for JDK20+
Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Turn the Runnables into callables
On Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:13 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Moving the memory leak test for SynchronousQueue into its own test and
>> runs only for JDK20+, using VirtualThreads
>
> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem. Regression test added for JDK20+
Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Addressing review feedback
--
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:19:19 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem. Regression test added for JDK20+
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:49:44 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Moving the memory leak test for SynchronousQueue into its own test and
>> runs only for JDK20+, using VirtualThreads
>
> S
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:19:19 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>>
>> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
>> of regression test. Suggestions are
> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>
> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
> of regression test. Suggestions are most welcome. /cc @DougLea
Viktor Klang has updated the pul
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:52:12 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding a leak detection test for SynchronousQueue
>
> Looks good; thanks. I don't know why I left out this check in a case
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:39:32 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>>
>> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
>> of regression test. Suggestions are
On Fri, 17 May 2024 11:35:55 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>>
>> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
>> of regression test. Suggestions are
> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>
> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
> of regression test. Suggestions are most welcome. /cc @DougLea
Viktor Klang has updated the pul
On Thu, 16 May 2024 15:06:45 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>>
>> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
>> of regression test. Suggestions are
On Thu, 16 May 2024 15:06:45 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
>> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>>
>> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
>> of regression test. Suggestions are
On Thu, 16 May 2024 14:54:52 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in
> the FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
>
> But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form
> of regression test. Suggestions are most
Local testing seems to indicate that this fix (which mirrors what's done in the
FIFO mode) addresses the problem.
But with that said, I haven't come up with a decent way of adding some form of
regression test. Suggestions are most welcome. /cc @DougLea
-
Commit messages:
- Memory
17 matches
Mail list logo
