On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
I'm sorry to hear this. It's done all the time in tests, by third-party
libraries. I fi
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java line 184:
> 182: * @throw
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:16:52 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> I agree with the evaluation of
> [JDK-8327786](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8327786) that
> `setAccessible(true)` isn't for most developers and this proposal is not
> worth doing.
I concur.
-
PR Comment: https://git.o
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
I agree with the evaluation of
[JDK-8327786](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-832778
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
For your information, [the proposal has been
rejected](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:22:44 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> > What is the "standard protocol" to find a reviewer?
>
> Reviewers will generally chime in of their own accord depending on their
> expertise, interest, availability, the perceived importance of the issue, and
> so on.
What can I do
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:06:53 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> What is the "standard protocol" to find a reviewer?
Reviewers will generally chime in of their own accord depending on their
expertise, interest, availability, the perceived importance of the issue, and
so on.
-
PR Comment: https:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
So the only thing left seems to be finding a reviewer. What is the "standard
protocol"
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 06:09:03 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> First, usually to propose a patch to core libraries, we usually submit an
> issue or suggest an enhancement to https://bugs.java.com, or ask at
> `core-libs-dev@openjdk.org`.
>
> A field that has been "set accessible" is supposed to be reus
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
https://openjdk.org/contribute/
u may firstly have a look at this.
-
PR Co
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
First, usually to propose a patch to core libraries, we usually submit an issue
or sugg
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:35:45 GMT, Sergey wrote:
> The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
> like so:
>
> object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
How do I find an eligible reviewer and create an issue to link this PR to?
Are there an
The feature allows to extract a private field value in a single expression,
like so:
object.getClass().getDeclaredField().setAccessible().get(object)
-
Commit messages:
- Add functional-style setAccessible()
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17578/files
Webrev: https://w
13 matches
Mail list logo
