On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 06:33:01 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> `test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/AccessCheckSuper.java` is one test that fails
>> the super class access check. @lfoltan may know whether there are more
>> tests besides this one.
>
> This code was necessary back when this was the `sun.reflect` p
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:18:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>> // If the loader is not the boot loader then throw an exception if its
>>> // superclass is in package jdk.internal.reflect
>>
>> This should not be needed. `jdk.internal.reflect` is a non-exported
>> package in `java.base` module. If
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:54:59 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Oh that's a good find. Maybe we should write a test for this, if as I
>> assume there isn't one already.
>> Edit: not with this RFE, just in general.
>
>> // If the loader is not the boot loader then throw an exception if its
>> // supercl
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 16:17:12 GMT, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/classfile/classFileParser.cpp line 4098:
>>
>>> 4096: }
>>> 4097: }
>>> 4098:
>>
>> This code should not be removed. The spec for this code should now be:
>>
>> // If the loader is not the boot loader
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 03:54:40 GMT, John R Rose wrote:
> Happily, that day has come.
Yes, feeling happy!I have been waiting to get rid of this last piece!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21571#issuecomment-2422885117
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 02:25:16 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> Mandy Chung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Remove unused classes
>
> src/hotspot/share/classfile/classFileParser.cpp line 4098:
>
>> 4096: }
>> 4097: }
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 22:44:05 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
>> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround
>> various issues [1] [2] [3].
>>
>> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:45:53 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround various
> issues [1] [2] [3].
>
> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in JDK
> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround various
> issues [1] [2] [3].
>
> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in JDK
> 22](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305104).
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:45:53 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
> The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
> special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround various
> issues [1] [2] [3].
>
> The old core reflection implementation was [removed in JDK
The old core reflection implementation generates dynamic classes that are
special cases in the VM to bypass bytecode verification to workaround various
issues [1] [2] [3] uncovered over time.
The old core reflection implementation was [removed in JDK
22](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305
17 matches
Mail list logo
