On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:13:33 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Looks fine.
Thanks!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/109#issuecomment-1932769043
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:50:10 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1ae85138](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1ae851387f881263ccc6aeace5afdd0f49d41d33)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit being backported w
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[1ae85138](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1ae851387f881263ccc6aeace5afdd0f49d41d33)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Paul Sandoz on 2 Feb 2024 and was
reviewed by Ma
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:22:10 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> My expectation is the risk is small, but of course non-zero. These tests can
>> be expensive to run so i was trying balance the risk without increasing test
>> execution times.
>>
>> I could strengthen the comment from:
>>
>>
> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
> performed when interpreted and by C1).
>
> This is an oversight and exp
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:34:40 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/incubator/vector/templates/X-LoadStoreTest.java.template line
>> 271:
>>
>>> 269: @DontInline
>>> 270: static $abstractvectortype$ fromArray($type$[] a, int i) {
>>> 271: return ($abstractvectortype$) SPECIES.f
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:45:41 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
> performed when in
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:10:26 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
>> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
>> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
>> perf
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:45:41 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
> performed when in
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:45:41 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
> performed when in
The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
`AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on the
offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are performed
when interpreted and by C1).
This is an oversight and explicit bounds
11 matches
Mail list logo
