On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:28:46 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
>> Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
>> `NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
>>
>> The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the
>> recently updated `DataDescript
> Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
> `NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
>
> The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the recently
> updated `DataDescriptorSignatureMissing` test, see #12959. That test is more
> comp
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:58:14 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
> `NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
>
> The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the recently
> updated `DataDescriptorSign
On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:14:59 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Eirik, Could you add a reference to [PR
> 12959](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12959/) or to
> [JDK-8303920](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303920) in the above
Thanks, that makes sense!
-
PR Comment: https://gi
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:58:14 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
> `NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
>
> The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the recently
> updated `DataDescriptorSignat
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:58:14 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
> `NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
>
> The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the recently
> updated `DataDescriptorSign
Please review this PR which suggests we retire the ZIP test
`NoExtensionSignature` along with its `test.jar` test vector.
The concern of a missing data descriptor signature is covered by the recently
updated `DataDescriptorSignatureMissing` test. That test is more complete,
includes more docu