Re: RFR: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless

2023-11-08 Thread David Holmes
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 06:43:12 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> Tests that directly use ProcessBuilder to spawn processes and do not pass >> the standard test command line arguments should be marked as `vm.flagless` >> to indicate to the testing infrastructure that they do not accept them and >> shoul

Re: RFR: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless

2023-11-08 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:04:49 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: > Tests that directly use ProcessBuilder to spawn processes and do not pass the > standard test command line arguments should be marked as `vm.flagless` to > indicate to the testing infrastructure that they do not accept them and > should not

Re: RFR: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless

2023-11-08 Thread Naoto Sato
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:04:49 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: > Tests that directly use ProcessBuilder to spawn processes and do not pass the > standard test command line arguments should be marked as `vm.flagless` to > indicate to the testing infrastructure that they do not accept them and > should not

Re: RFR: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless

2023-11-08 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:04:49 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: > Tests that directly use ProcessBuilder to spawn processes and do not pass the > standard test command line arguments should be marked as `vm.flagless` to > indicate to the testing infrastructure that they do not accept them and > should not

RFR: 8319574: Exec/process tests should be marked as flagless

2023-11-08 Thread Roger Riggs
Tests that directly use ProcessBuilder to spawn processes and do not pass the standard test command line arguments should be marked as `vm.flagless` to indicate to the testing infrastructure that they do not accept them and should not be run with extra test command line options `test.vm.opts` an