Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-11 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:40:40 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813 > (sorry for filing another one, I realized there was an issue with the JBS > issues pointing the wrong way) Marked as reviewed by jvernee (Reviewer). - PR Revi

[jdk21] RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813 (sorry for filing another one, I realized there was an issue with the JBS issues pointing the wrong way) - Commit messages: - Backport 6569b252b9e61e3eed77039c483529154feffbba Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/109/f

Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:08:00 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813 Closing due to issue when creating backport. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/107#issuecomment-1629921468

Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:08:00 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813 Marked as reviewed by jvernee (Reviewer). - PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/107#pullrequestreview-1522609664

[jdk21] RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
Clean backport of https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813 - Commit messages: - Backport 6569b252b9e61e3eed77039c483529154feffbba Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21/pull/107/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk21&pr=107&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/br

Re: RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:00:54 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote: > This simple PR fixes an issue where `this segment` was used in the javadoc of > two static methods. Marked as reviewed by jvernee (Reviewer). - PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813#pullrequestreview-15222

RFR: 8311593: Minor doc issue in MemorySegment::copy

2023-07-10 Thread Maurizio Cimadamore
This simple PR fixes an issue where `this segment` was used in the javadoc of two static methods. - Commit messages: - Initial push Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14813/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=14813&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.o