Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8310868: Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}

2023-06-26 Thread Alan Bateman
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 06:28:07 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hi all, > > This pull request contains a backport of commit > [013367b4](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/013367b4831094cdd330564378de69deccd0dc4b) > from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository. > > The commit

[jdk21] RFR: 8310868: Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}

2023-06-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Hi all, This pull request contains a backport of commit [013367b4](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/013367b4831094cdd330564378de69deccd0dc4b) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository. The commit being backported was authored by Jaikiran Pai on 26 Jun 2023 and was

Re: RFR: 8310868: Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}

2023-06-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 05:58:41 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I please get a review of this trivial change which fixes a javadoc issue > reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310868? > > I ran `make docs-image` locally with this change and the link is now > correctly rendered in the g

Re: RFR: 8310868: Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}

2023-06-25 Thread Alan Bateman
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023 05:58:41 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Can I please get a review of this trivial change which fixes a javadoc issue > reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310868? > > I ran `make docs-image` locally with this change and the link is now > correctly rendered in the g

RFR: 8310868: Thread.interrupt() method's javadoc has an incorrect {@link}

2023-06-25 Thread Jaikiran Pai
Can I please get a review of this trivial change which fixes a javadoc issue reported in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310868? I ran `make docs-image` locally with this change and the link is now correctly rendered in the generated javadoc. - Commit messages: - 8310868: Thr