Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-07-12 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:21:29 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Hi all, > > This pull request contains a backport of commit > [f82c8184](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f82c8184b26142da4018ae096cfa39d87a4c6540) > from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository. > > The commit bei

Re: [jdk21] RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-07-12 Thread Naoto Sato
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:21:29 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Hi all, > > This pull request contains a backport of commit > [f82c8184](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f82c8184b26142da4018ae096cfa39d87a4c6540) > from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository. > > The commit bei

[jdk21] RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-07-12 Thread Stuart Marks
Hi all, This pull request contains a backport of commit [f82c8184](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/f82c8184b26142da4018ae096cfa39d87a4c6540) from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository. The commit being backported was authored by Stuart Marks on 12 Jul 2023 and was rev

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements [v4]

2023-07-10 Thread Stuart Marks
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 22:55:12 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the >> text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other >> reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet >> and

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements [v4]

2023-07-07 Thread Stuart Marks
> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and then file the CSR. Stuart Marks has updated the pull requ

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements [v3]

2023-07-07 Thread Stuart Marks
> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and then file the CSR. Stuart Marks has updated the pull requ

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements [v2]

2023-06-23 Thread Roger Riggs
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 22:07:19 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: >> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the >> text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other >> reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet >> an

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-22 Thread Stuart Marks
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:38:43 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and th

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements [v2]

2023-06-22 Thread Stuart Marks
> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and then file the CSR. Stuart Marks has updated the pull requ

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-16 Thread Brent Christian
On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:30:55 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the >> text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other >> reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet >> and

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-16 Thread Roger Riggs
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:38:43 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and th

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-15 Thread Stuart Marks
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:54:09 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the >> text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other >> reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet >

Re: RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-15 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:38:43 GMT, Stuart Marks wrote: > Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the > text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other > reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet > and th

RFR: 8308694: Clarify reversed() default methods' implementation requirements

2023-06-15 Thread Stuart Marks
Can I get a preliminary review of the wording for Deque.reversed()? If the text is good, I'll make corresponding changes to the implSpecs of the other reversed() default methods, namely those in List, SortedMap, and SortedSet and then file the CSR. - Commit messages: - 8308694: Cl