On Mon, 8 May 2023 19:05:43 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti
wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Slight perf improvement using int instead of long for local nanosDiff
>
> I think that the explanation of the old
On Sun, 7 May 2023 17:58:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The implementation of java.time.Instant.until(I2, ChronoUnit) in some cases
>> did not correctly borrow or carry from the nanos to the seconds when
>> computing using ChronoUnit.MILLIS or ChronoUnit.MICROS.
>> The errant computation was int
On Sun, 7 May 2023 17:58:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The implementation of java.time.Instant.until(I2, ChronoUnit) in some cases
>> did not correctly borrow or carry from the nanos to the seconds when
>> computing using ChronoUnit.MILLIS or ChronoUnit.MICROS.
>> The errant computation was int
On Sun, 7 May 2023 17:58:26 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The implementation of java.time.Instant.until(I2, ChronoUnit) in some cases
>> did not correctly borrow or carry from the nanos to the seconds when
>> computing using ChronoUnit.MILLIS or ChronoUnit.MICROS.
>> The errant computation was int
> The implementation of java.time.Instant.until(I2, ChronoUnit) in some cases
> did not correctly borrow or carry from the nanos to the seconds when
> computing using ChronoUnit.MILLIS or ChronoUnit.MICROS.
> The errant computation was introduced by
> [JDK-8273369](https://bugs.openjdk.org/brows
