On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:30:22 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> By default `BufferedInputStream` is constructed with internal buffer with
>> capacity 8192. In some cases this buffer is never used, e.g. when we call
>> `IS.readNBytes()` or `IS.readAllBytes()` (relying on `BIS.read1()`) or when
>> `
On Sat, 25 Mar 2023 05:55:46 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> I think the benchmark would benefit with a few words explaining why you
> focused on those methods/calling patterns. For someone walking past this
> benchmark, this is not obvious why you picked those.
I think the interesting case is wh
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:30:22 GMT, Sergey Tsypanov wrote:
>> By default `BufferedInputStream` is constructed with internal buffer with
>> capacity 8192. In some cases this buffer is never used, e.g. when we call
>> `IS.readNBytes()` or `IS.readAllBytes()` (relying on `BIS.read1()`) or when
>> `
> By default `BufferedInputStream` is constructed with internal buffer with
> capacity 8192. In some cases this buffer is never used, e.g. when we call
> `IS.readNBytes()` or `IS.readAllBytes()` (relying on `BIS.read1()`) or when
> `BufferedInputStream` is cascaded.
Sergey Tsypanov has updated
