On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 20:01:44 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> > I can kick of a test run internally next week or perhaps Sunday
>
> Thanks for your reviews, Lance and Iris!
>
> FWIW, the test ran fine on Github Actions, including on `linux-x86` (which is
> 32-bit, right?):
>
> ```
> TEST: java/uti
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 18:43:31 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> I can kick of a test run internally next week or perhaps Sunday
Thanks for your reviews, Lance and Iris!
FWIW, the test ran fine on Github Actions, including on `linux-x86` (which is
32-bit, right?):
TEST: java/util/zip/DataDescriptorS
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 18:21:07 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
> > Thinking some more about this, I would like to see us keep the Zip
> > generated by python, store it in a byte array (or equivalent) as it also
> > validate that we can still process the zip given this was the original test
> > and the
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 19:54:12 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote:
> Thinking some more about this, I would like to see us keep the Zip generated
> by python, store it in a byte array (or equivalent) as it also validate that
> we can still process the zip given this was the original test and the zip is
>
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:48:48 GMT, Eirik Bjorsnos wrote:
>> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
>> back to life.
>>
>> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
>> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signa
> Please review this PR which brings the DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test
> back to life.
>
> This test currently calls out to Python to create a test vector ZIP with a
> Data Descriptor without the recommended but optional signature. The Python
> dependency has turned out to be very brittl
11 matches
Mail list logo
