Re: RFR: 8303891: Zip64SizeTest could use a sparse file [v4]

2023-03-10 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> This PR suggests we use a sparse file when the Zip64SizeTest writes a ZIP > file with a 5GB entry. > > The size requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some builds, > see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8259866) > > Using a sparse file reduces the disk space r

Re: RFR: 8303891: Zip64SizeTest could use a sparse file [v3]

2023-03-10 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> This PR suggests we use a sparse file when the Zip64SizeTest writes a ZIP > file with a 5GB entry. > > The size requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some builds, > see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8259866) > > Using a sparse file reduces the disk space r

Re: RFR: 8303891: Zip64SizeTest could use a sparse file [v2]

2023-03-09 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
> This PR suggests we use a sparse file when the Zip64SizeTest writes a ZIP > file with a 5GB entry. > > The size requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some builds, > see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8259866) > > Using a sparse file reduces the disk space r

RFR: 8303891: Zip64SizeTest could use a sparse file

2023-03-09 Thread Eirik Bjorsnos
This PR suggests we use a sparse file when the Zip64SizeTest writes a ZIP file with a 5GB entry. The size requirement of this test is known to cause problems in some builds, see [JDK-8259866](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8259866) Using a sparse file reduces the disk space requirements o