On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:58:54 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might
> underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with
> `arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
>
> Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I obser
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:58:54 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might
> underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with
> `arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
>
> Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I obser
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:58:54 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might
> underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with
> `arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
>
> Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I obser
On Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:58:54 GMT, Claes Redestad wrote:
> During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might
> underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with
> `arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
>
> Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I obser
During work on #12453 @schlosna reported that `array.clone()` might
underperform `System.arraycopy` in microbenchmarks and I opted to go with
`arraycopy` throughout while investigating.
Testing on x86 (SandyBridge, AVX2) I observe no difference at all between the
setups. On aarch the only diffe
