On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:11:22 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by
>> doing I/O operations outside synch blocks.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> R
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Remove comment and rename class
-
Changes:
- all: h
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 16:27:34 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Module.java line 120:
>>
>>> 118: // memory semantics that preserves ordering and visibility across
>>> threads.
>>> 119: //
>>> 120: // Used reflectively via Unsafe
>>
>> I assume L119-120
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 16:46:08 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by
>> doing I/O operations outside synch blocks.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Un
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Undo more unintended edits
-
Changes:
- all: https:
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Fix things from PR comments
- Undo unintended changes
-
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 15:19:38 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use Unsafe instead of synchronized
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Module.java line 120:
>
>> 118: // memo
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023 15:05:13 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by
>> doing I/O operations outside synch blocks.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Us
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 08:51:16 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by
>> doing I/O operations outside synch blocks.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
>
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Use Unsafe instead of synchronized
-
Changes:
- all
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 08:51:16 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by
>> doing I/O operations outside synch blocks.
>
> Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional
> commits since the last revision:
>
>
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 07:52:25 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Module.java line 281:
>>
>>> 279:
>>> 280: private static boolean isNativeAccessEnabled(Module target) {
>>> 281: if (target.enableNativeAccess)
>>
>> @minborg It'd seem a bit easier to imp
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional
commits since the last revision:
- Revert benchmark change
- Fix typo
- Use another type of comm
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Per Minborg has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Update after comments
- Remove warning
-
Changes:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 12:26:26 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
> This PR proposed to reduce contention in synchronized methods mainly by doing
> I/O operations outside synch blocks.
Let me take a step back here and explain the reason why I think this PR is
worth looking at. Firstly, I think the argument
15 matches
Mail list logo
