Re: RFR: 8297605: DelayQueue javadoc is confusing [v2]

2023-03-21 Thread Martin Buchholz
> Inviting @DougLea and @viktorklang-ora to review. > > As usual, I couldn't resist more fiddling. > - Added missing tests for take, remove(), remove(Object). > - Improved DelayQueueTest's testing infrastructure > - added more test assertions > - linkified new javadoc definitions Martin Buchhol

Re: RFR: 8297605: DelayQueue javadoc is confusing

2023-03-16 Thread Alan Bateman
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 20:00:56 GMT, Martin Buchholz wrote: > Inviting @DougLea and @viktorklang-ora to review. > > As usual, I couldn't resist more fiddling. > - Added missing tests for take, remove(), remove(Object). > - Improved DelayQueueTest's testing infrastructure > - added more test assert

Re: RFR: 8297605: DelayQueue javadoc is confusing

2023-03-06 Thread Viktor Klang
The message from this sender included one or more files which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent. -- On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 20:00:56 GMT, Martin Buchholz wr

Re: RFR: 8297605: DelayQueue javadoc is confusing

2023-03-02 Thread Doug Lea
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 20:00:56 GMT, Martin Buchholz wrote: > Inviting @DougLea and @viktorklang-ora to review. > > As usual, I couldn't resist more fiddling. > - Added missing tests for take, remove(), remove(Object). > - Improved DelayQueueTest's testing infrastructure > - added more test assert

RFR: 8297605: DelayQueue javadoc is confusing

2023-03-02 Thread Martin Buchholz
Inviting @DougLea and @viktorklang-ora to review. As usual, I couldn't resist more fiddling. - Added missing tests for take, remove(), remove(Object). - Improved DelayQueueTest's testing infrastructure - added more test assertions - linkified new javadoc definitions - Commit messag