On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 20:17:57 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Should the masking out unassigned bits that is done in this method be
>> extended to the existing `AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags(mask, location)`;
>> Instead of throwing `IllegalArgumentException`?
>> The two methods should be consistent in t
On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 19:59:08 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Should the masking out unassigned bits that is done in this method be
> extended to the existing `AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags(mask, location)`;
> Instead of throwing `IllegalArgumentException`? The two methods should be
> consistent in thi
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 03:33:25 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> I would propose to say:
>>
>> Mask bits that do not match an {@code AccessFlag} for the location and
>> class file format version are ignored.
>>
>> The case arises when the mask argument contains mask bits that are not
>> cons
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> implicitly uses the access flags from the current/most recent class file
> format version. For current and past class file format versions there ar
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 23:33:14 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessFlag.java line 519:
>>
>>> 517: * @param cffv the class file format version
>>> 518: */
>>> 519: public static Set maskToAccessFlags(int mask, Location
>>> location,
>>
>> T
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 23:10:20 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 1345:
>>
>>> 1343: * its {@code INTERFACE} flag is absent, even when the
>>> 1344: * component type is an interface
>>> 1345: * its class file format version is that
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:47:29 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Updated the descriptions of AccessFlags being dependent on the class file
>> version number.
>>Removed unnecessary te
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:43:03 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Updated the descriptions of AccessFlags being dependent on the class file
>> version number.
>>Removed unnecessary te
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:20 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
>> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
>> implicitly uses the access flags from the current/most recent class file
>> format version
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:52:20 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
>> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
>> implicitly uses the access flags from the current/most recent class file
>> format version
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> implicitly uses the access flags from the current/most recent class file
> format version. For current and past class file format versions there ar
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:33:44 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Yes, the location information via
> `AccessFlags.locations(ClassFileFormatVersion)` provides the needed
> information. And the tests verify that information. My objective was to make
> the AccessFlags returned for a class reflect the class
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 22:56:27 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> assume the access flags are from the current/most recent class file format
> version. For cu
On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 22:56:27 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
> The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
> java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
> assume the access flags are from the current/most recent class file format
> version. For cu
The accessFlags() methods added (in JDK 20, the current release) to
java.lang.Class, java.lang.reflect.Executable, and java.lang.reflect.Field
assume the access flags are from the current/most recent class file format
version. For current and past class file format versions there are few
signif
15 matches
Mail list logo
