On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:20:02 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
>> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
>> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
>> added
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:56:49 GMT, Aleksei Voitylov
wrote:
> Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
> turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as
> for 8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it
> ad
Unlike on x86 (see 8285868 and the discussion in review), isFinite intrinsic
turned out to be profitable on RISC-V using the same fclass instruction as for
8293695 (isInfinite instrinsic). Therefore, I'm proposing to have it added on
RISC-V in this PR.
benchmark results:
before:
Benchmark
11 matches
Mail list logo
