Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v3]

2023-05-23 Thread Naoto Sato
On Tue, 23 May 2023 05:31:37 GMT, Justin Lu wrote: >> Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of >> Decimal Format. It aims to resolve >> [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as >> [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-62821

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v3]

2023-05-22 Thread Justin Lu
> Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of > Decimal Format. It aims to resolve > [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as > [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6282188). > > **Scientific Notation** in Decimal Format conta

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v2]

2023-05-22 Thread Justin Lu
On Mon, 22 May 2023 23:31:37 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Review: Use Static dfs, error message, and exponent digit. Hard code min >> and max digits instead of calculating at runtim

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v2]

2023-05-22 Thread Naoto Sato
On Mon, 22 May 2023 23:03:10 GMT, Justin Lu wrote: >> Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of >> Decimal Format. It aims to resolve >> [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as >> [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-62821

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v2]

2023-05-22 Thread Justin Lu
On Mon, 22 May 2023 20:41:29 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Review: Use Static dfs, error message, and exponent digit. Hard code min >> and max digits instead of calculating at runtim

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented [v2]

2023-05-22 Thread Justin Lu
> Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of > Decimal Format. It aims to resolve > [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as > [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6282188). > > **Scientific Notation** in Decimal Format conta

Re: RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented

2023-05-22 Thread Naoto Sato
On Sat, 20 May 2023 00:00:42 GMT, Justin Lu wrote: > Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of > Decimal Format. It aims to resolve > [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as > [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6282188).

RFR: 8159023: Engineering notation of DecimalFormat does not work as documented

2023-05-19 Thread Justin Lu
Please review this PR which updates the Scientific Notation section of Decimal Format. It aims to resolve [JDK-8159023](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8159023) as well as [JDK-6282188](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6282188). **Scientific Notation** in Decimal Format contains the defi