Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-19 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-19 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-18 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-18 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-17 Thread Chen Liang
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-17 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 01:57:56 GMT, Chen Liang wrote: >> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based >> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: >> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance >> interface) >> 2.

Re: RFR: 6983726: Reimplement MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance [v26]

2023-07-17 Thread Chen Liang
> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based > implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues: > 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance > interface) > 2. Does not allow future expansion to support SAM[^1] abstrac