On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:36:33 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix the lazy test, thanks Jorn Vernee!
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleProxies/ProxiesImplementationTest.java
>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:15:51 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based
>> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
>> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance
>> interface)
>> 2.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:15:51 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based
>> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
>> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance
>> interface)
>> 2.
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:38:42 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix the lazy test, thanks Jorn Vernee!
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandleProxies/ProxiesImplementationTest.java
>
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:15:51 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based
>> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
>> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance
>> interface)
>> 2.
> As John Rose has pointed out in this issue, the current j.l.r.Proxy based
> implementation of MethodHandleProxies.asInterface has a few issues:
> 1. Exposes too much information via Proxy supertype (and WrapperInstance
> interface)
> 2. Does not allow future expansion to support SAM[^1] abstrac
