On 8/22/2022 11:57 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 22/08/2022 18:13, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
I understand that the methods are behaving as specified.
However, I still think that
int.class.getPackageName() = "java.lang"
int.class.describeConstable().get().packageName() = ""
is surprising behavior
On 22/08/2022 18:13, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
I understand that the methods are behaving as specified.
However, I still think that
int.class.getPackageName() = "java.lang"
int.class.describeConstable().get().packageName() = ""
is surprising behavior. And should probably as a minimum be
docume
22/2022 2:17 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was playing around with java.lang.constant and found an inconsistency
> between
> ClassDesc::packageName and Class::getPackageName as outlined in the table
> below.
>
behavioral compatibility, there would have to be a much
stronger case for altering its behavior at this point.
-Joe
On 8/22/2022 2:17 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
Hi,
I was playing around with java.lang.constant and found an inconsistency between
ClassDesc::packageName and Class::getPackageName as outli
Hi,
I was playing around with java.lang.constant and found an inconsistency between
ClassDesc::packageName and Class::getPackageName as outlined in the table below.
Specifically dealing with primitive and array types.
Class ClassDesc::packageName Class::getPackage Class::getPackageName
