Re: RFR: 8344925: translet-name ignored, when package-name is also set via TransformerFactory.setAttribute

2025-02-07 Thread Zheng Feng
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:09:47 GMT, Zheng Feng wrote: > …String) > > This bug seems from the improper handling of package and class name > initialization in `XSLTC` since there is a default value of `_packageName` > with `die.verwandlung`. This fix is just adjusting to call

Withdrawn: 8344925: translet-name ignored, when package-name is also set via TransformerFactory.setAttribute

2025-02-07 Thread Zheng Feng
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:09:47 GMT, Zheng Feng wrote: > …String) > > This bug seems from the improper handling of package and class name > initialization in `XSLTC` since there is a default value of `_packageName` > with `die.verwandlung`. This fix is just adjusting to call

RFR: 8344925: translet-name ignored, when package-name is also set via TransformerFactory.setAttribute

2025-01-23 Thread Zheng Feng
…String) This bug seems from the improper handling of package and class name initialization in `XSLTC` since there is a default value of `_packageName` with `die.verwandlung`. This fix is just adjusting to call `setPackageName` before `setClassName`. I've done the tire1 and tire2 tests. The t

Re: RFR: 8344925: translet-name ignored, when package-name is also set via TransformerFactory.setAttribute

2025-01-23 Thread Zheng Feng
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:09:47 GMT, Zheng Feng wrote: > …String) > > This bug seems from the improper handling of package and class name > initialization in `XSLTC` since there is a default value of `_packageName` > with `die.verwandlung`. This fix is just adjusting to call