://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/23/docs/api/java.base/java/util/Deque.html
Wondering when is the change supposed to take effect or does it mean the
fix is not complete?
Regards,
Turkhan
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:57 PM Chen Liang wrote:
> Hi Turkhan, this mail belongs to core-libs-dev list. I h
On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 21:06:31 GMT, Turkhan wrote:
> This PR fixes `java.util.Deque`'s specification to name `peekFirst()` as an
> equivalent to Stack's `peek()` method since both of them don't throw when a
> collection is empty. This is not the case with the curren
On Wed, 7 Aug 2024 21:44:09 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> This PR fixes `java.util.Deque`'s specification to name `peekFirst()` as an
>> equivalent to Stack's `peek()` method since both of them don't throw when a
>> collection is empty. This is not the case with the current `getFirst()`
>> method.
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:48:52 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR fixes `java.util.Deque`'s specification to name `peekFirst()` as an
>> equivalent to Stack's `peek()` method since both of them don't throw when a
>> collection is empty. This is not the case with the current `getFirst()`
>> method
This PR fixes `java.util.Deque`'s specification to name `peekFirst()` as an
equivalent to Stack's `peek()` method since both of them don't throw when a
collection is empty. This is not the case with the current `getFirst()` method.
Please let me know if I have to fix something in the PR. Will ap
