On Fri, 23 May 2025 16:05:08 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
> `Proxy#getInvocationHandler(Object)` throws a `NullPointerException` if the
> specified argument is `null`. This PR adds the missing `throws` declaration
> for the NPE.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
On Mon, 26 May 2025 05:43:49 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
>> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8357597: Update copyright year
>
> The change looks OK to me. Please update the c
> `Proxy#getInvocationHandler(Object)` throws a `NullPointerException` if the
> specified argument is `null`. This PR adds the missing `throws` declaration
> for the NPE.
Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
`Proxy#getInvocationHandler(Object)` throws a `NullPointerException` if the
specified argument is `null`. This PR adds the missing `throws` declaration for
the NPE.
-
Commit messages:
- 8357597: Add throws declaration for NPE
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25419/files
Hi,
recently I've come across the documentation of
Proxy#getInvocationHandler(Object) and recognized that there's a missing throws
declaration for a NullPointerException. The expression
Proxy.getInvocationHandler(null) fails, because proxy.getClass() is called
without asserting that proxy is n
On Sun, 4 May 2025 16:45:11 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry for
> Lookup.findGetter.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 2a4f37cc
Author:Steffen Nießing
Committer: Chen Liang
URL:
On Mon, 5 May 2025 18:59:29 GMT, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry
>> for Lookup.findGetter.
>
> Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
> merge or a rebase. The increm
Hello,
recently I've discovered that the JavaDoc of the instance methods of
java.net.http.HttpHeaders lacks the throws declarations for
NullPointerExceptions. The static creator method `of` contains such a
declaration. So the snippet `HttpHeaders.of(null, null)` is documented to throw
an NPE,
On Sun, 4 May 2025 17:01:54 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Thanks for the mailing list communication and reply.
>
> Check out https://openjdk.org/guide/ for more steps. For example, a patch
> should usually wait 24 hours for sufficient reviews.
@liach Thanks for the fast review and the creation of th
On Sun, 4 May 2025 17:20:29 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs wrote:
> Nit: Would be nice if the PR title/description made it clear for the casual
> reader that this is a documentation/Javadoc typo, as opposed to a code issue.
Thanks for the hint. I've updated the PR accordingly.
> This gives reviewers som
> JavaDoc only: This PR fixes a typo in the `bytecode behavior` table entry for
> Lookup.findGetter.
Steffen Nießing has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. Th
This PR fixes a typo in the bytecode cast for Lookup.findGetter.
-
Commit messages:
- 8356119: Correct field type for bytecode cast
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25024/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=25024&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.o
Hello,
I've found a small documentation inconvenience in the MethodHandles.Lookup
class documentation. In the Lookup Factory Methods table the field types of the
member and bytecode definitions for lookup.findGetter diverge:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.base/share/classes
s, though in some
> cases backward compatibility has forced them to be specified.
>
> Regards, Roger
>
> On 4/30/25 4:37 PM, Steffen Nießing wrote:
>
>> Thanks, haven't seen unsigned right shift before. You're right, it should be
>> fine to use the unsigned o
t; ------------
>> *From:* core-libs-dev on behalf of
>> Joseph D. Darcy
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 30, 2025 2:54 PM
>> *To:* Steffen Nießing ; core-libs-
>> d...@openjdk.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Jav
Hello,
I'm new to the OpenJDK community and plan to make my first change.
I've found a small mistake in the documentation of java.util.Date#hashCode().
The documentation provides a Java expression of the returned value, which uses
a non-existent operator '>>>'.
Now I'm searching for a sponsor
16 matches
Mail list logo
