On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 19:41:17 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be
>> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 11:34:43 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Hmm. I'll consider that. The javadoc in java.lang.Class is inconsistent in
>> the formatting of "void" as a type name, some instances are in code markup
>> while others are not.
>
>> @jddarcy and @pavelrappo, as I understood it, @liach is
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:35:09 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 818:
>>
>>> 816: * they represent, namely {@code boolean}, {@code byte},
>>> 817: * {@code char}, {@code short}, {@code int},
>>> 818: * {@code long}, {@code float}, and {@c
