Hi all,
Few days ago, I've suggested on this list to try having latest Xalan-J
XSLT 3.0 development code (it's available here,
https://github.com/apache/xalan-java/tree/xalan-j_xslt3.0_mvn. IMHO, I've
written all XSLT 3 and corresponding XPath 3.1 changes within Xalan-J's XSL
3 dev repos branch
serializer emits
results a bit differently (mostly these are whitespace character
issues, but compliant with XSLT 3.0 spec) than the XSL tests expected
output specified within W3C's XSLT 3.0 test suite. I'm trying to get
around with these XSL tests issues.
Many thanks.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
LT_knowmad?t=ZKJE2bkeVyceZTxTmy1sPg&s=09 and probably
others who've been using Xalan-J's XSL 3 implementation. Gary Gregory
(Apache Xalan's PMC chair) has also rigorously tested Xalan-J's XSL 3
implementation and reported it to be ok and useful.
Many thanks.
Regards,
Mukul
>
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your reply.
On Thu, 27 Feb, 2025, 13:41 Alan Bateman, wrote:
> If you are interested in contributing to the XML implementations in the
> java.xml module then this would be welcomed. It's always better to start
> small with bug fixes, test improvements and other changes to
es on xml.com about few of XSL
3 language features, and how they're implemented within Xalan-J,
https://www.xml.com/articles/2024/07/22/string-analysis-with-analyze-string/
https://www.xml.com/articles/2023/12/05/xml-path-language-xpath-higher-order-functions/
Many thanks.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
e let me
know and I shall try my best to answer questions wrt this.
I'm also copying this mail to Joseph Kesselman (Xalan PMC member) &
Gary Gregory (Xalan PMC chair), who have also been working on this
implementation.
With best wishes.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 11:05 AM Mukul Gandhi wro
advised me to post this request to, this mail list to try having
this request fulfilled.
Hoping that this list shall oblige with this request over the next few
weeks, or months.
Many thanks.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
