alysing this
code, erasing a bit too much? Even if the code uses `Child` without type
argument, I would expect the return type of `getValues()` to be well
defined as `List`?
What do you think?
I am sure there is some rational explanation that I missed for this
behaviour. I could not find a JBS
On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 13:55:27 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> I'm breaking this change out as a separate improvement, since it will not be
>> generally possible to adjust these limits on the j.u.c primitives since they
>> might already use a backing `long` to pack in information which needs to be
>>
