On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:26:22 GMT, Anton Artemov wrote:
>> This PR contains changes for the 1st phase of the `LockingMode` flag
>> obsoletion.
>>
>> The work is done by @fbredber, I have taken it over and am finishing it
>> while he's on vacation.
>>
>> In the 1st phase one keeps the `Lockin
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:05:18 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/continuation.hpp line 66:
>>
>>> 64:
>>> 65: enum preempt_kind {
>>> 66: freeze_on_monitorenter = 1,
>>
>> Is there a reason why the first enumerator doesn't start at zero?
>
> There was one val
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 02:41:44 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> Changed.
>
> Note that `frame::sender_sp_offset` is 0 instead of 2 on linux-riscv64, which
> is different from aarch64 or x86-64. So I think we should revert this change:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565/commits/12213a70c1cf0639555f
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:11:38 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/sharedRuntime_aarch64.cpp line 2032:
>>
>>> 2030: // Force freeze slow path in case we try to preempt. We will pin
>>> the
>>> 2031: // vthread to the carrier (see
>>> FreezeBase::recurse_freeze
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 14:28:30 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
> This is the implementation of JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without
> Pinning. See [JEP 491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337395) for
> further details.
>
> In order to make the code review easier the changes hav
On Sat, 2 Nov 2024 02:41:44 GMT, Fei Yang wrote:
>> Changed.
>
> Note that `frame::sender_sp_offset` is 0 instead of 2 on linux-riscv64, which
> is different from aarch64 or x86-64. So I think we should revert this change:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21565/commits/12213a70c1cf0639555f
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:37:14 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without
>> Pinning. See [JEP 491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337395) for
>> further details.
>>
>> In order to make the code review easier the changes
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 20:05:18 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/share/runtime/continuation.hpp line 66:
>>
>>> 64:
>>> 65: enum preempt_kind {
>>> 66: freeze_on_monitorenter = 1,
>>
>> Is there a reason why the first enumerator doesn't start at zero?
>
> There was one val
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 21:08:26 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without
>> Pinning. See [JEP 491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337395) for
>> further details.
>>
>> In order to make the code review easier the change
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 00:44:14 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> This is the implementation of JEP 491: Synchronize Virtual Threads without
>> Pinning. See [JEP 491](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8337395) for
>> further details.
>>
>> In order to make the code review easier the change
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 13:11:38 GMT, Patricio Chilano Mateo
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/sharedRuntime_aarch64.cpp line 2032:
>>
>>> 2030: // Force freeze slow path in case we try to preempt. We will pin
>>> the
>>> 2031: // vthread to the carrier (see
>>> FreezeBase::recurse_freeze
11 matches
Mail list logo
