On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 17:59:32 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Tracked in 8360541; I think we can implement in a separate patch. Don't know
>> if this is worth backporting to MRs.
>
> Ah yes, I'd forgotten I created this issue to track clarifying the spec.
Sure, the clarification is long past being us
On Wed, 18 Jun 2025 17:51:20 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: ff24088c
Author: Doug Lea
URL:
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Use javadoc internal linkages
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:21:15 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
>> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-8311131
-
Changes:
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with 20 additional commits
since the last revision:
- Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/rem
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 12:54:29 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
>> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:46:21 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
>> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or
a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Address review comments; add JDK-8
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-6526284 doc update
-
C
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-6625724 as docfix
-
C
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-6714849 doc update
-
C
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 18:16:08 GMT, Pavel Rappo wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix ARFU type; add JDK-7176957
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/Co
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:00:52 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concu
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Fix ARFU type; add JDK-7
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Address review comments; add JDK-6
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:39:05 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concur
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:10:42 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/con
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:47:43 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improvements
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Adding JDK-8333172 to doc improv
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-8195628 doc fix
-
C
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-6317534 and JDK-6351533 doc improv
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-8190889 docfix
-
C
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-8186959 docfix
-
C
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Add JDK-8353155 doc impro
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:42:01 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/CompletionSta
> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
Address review comments
-
C
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:36:19 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with
>> documentation updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/CompletionStage.java line
> 103:
>
>> 101: * cau
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 09:32:43 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/Flow.java line 64:
>>
>>> 62: * control required in most implementations (for example {@link
>>> 63: * SubmissionPublisher}), and omits some error processing needed to
>>> 64: * fully con
This collects miscellaneous open issues that can be resolved with documentation
updates; each indicated by adding JDK issue numbers
-
Commit messages:
- Revert
- Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/master' into JDK-8359919
- Initial set of doc updates
- Merge branch
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:07:11 GMT, He-Pin(kerr) wrote:
> Rename auxilliary to auxiliary
@He-Pin please /integrate
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25685#issuecomment-2983757923
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 09:07:11 GMT, He-Pin(kerr) wrote:
> Rename auxilliary to auxiliary
Thanks for finding and fixing this.
-
Marked as reviewed by dl (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25685#pullrequestreview-2912920005
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:24:57 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>>> We could likely check if there's any remaining capacity up front, and
>>> immediately return false?
>>
>> We could if you like. I wanted to make as few changes as possible, to not
>> introduce unexpected changes. This particular bug was
On Tue, 27 May 2025 09:35:51 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> I had to tweak the language a bit to better reflect the intent of the text.
This seems OK. Maybe needlessly pedantic, but OK :-)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25462#issuecomment-2915821182
On Sat, 24 May 2025 11:35:33 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> Method startDelayScheduler should trap the ISE thrown by
> SharedThreadContainer.start and possibly re-try termination before eventually
> throwing RejectedExecutionException.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset:
> Method startDelayScheduler should trap the ISE thrown by
> SharedThreadContainer.start and possibly re-try termination before eventually
> throwing RejectedExecutionException.
Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit
since the last revision:
On Sat, 24 May 2025 15:57:17 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Method startDelayScheduler should trap the ISE thrown by
>> SharedThreadContainer.start and possibly re-try termination before
>> eventually throwing RejectedExecutionException.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoi
Method startDelayScheduler should trap the ISE thrown by
SharedThreadContainer.start and possibly re-try termination before eventually
throwing RejectedExecutionException.
-
Commit messages:
- undo wrong origin
- Handle IllegalStateException from SharedThreadContainer.start
- Rev
On Thu, 22 May 2025 14:59:04 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/ScheduledExecutorTest.java line 703:
>>
>>> 701: final ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor p = new
>>> ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor(1);
>>> 702: List> tasks = new ArrayList<>();
>>> 703: fi
On Fri, 9 May 2025 14:50:49 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>>> I'm a bit uneasy about incrementing the `count` in `linkFirst` but not
>>> enforcing the invariant. What's the benefit to changing linkFirst and
>>> linkLast to return void instead of keeping the original returning a boolean?
>>
>> I bas
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 15:23:18 GMT, kabutz wrote:
> We logged several bugs on the LinkedBlockingDeque. This aggregates them into
> a single bug report and PR.
>
> 1. LinkedBlockingDeque does not immediately throw InterruptedException in
> put/take
>
> The LinkedBlockingDeque does not behave con
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 12:38:55 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Yeah, I originally did that, but the following patch is the "smallest
>> change".
>> Given that the "original code" obtained the Field instance each call, this
>> is still likely a performance improvement.
>
> This code has always used ge
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:22:37 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This Pull Request replaces the uses of Field + setAccessible to modify final
>> fields in java.util.concurrent with Unsafe.
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:54:03 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> I wonder if we could just change it to return `new
>> ConcurrentSkipListSet<>(m)`. COWAL could be changed to return a new object
>> too.
>
> The set only has a map field, and AbstractSet does not define any additional
> field. The map shou
On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 12:36:43 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> This PR reverts the deactivation changes of the updates to FJP introduced in
> JDK-8319447.
Looks good. Thanks for tracking this down.
-
Marked as reviewed by dl (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24473#p
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:07:56 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
> (Copied from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319447)
>
> The problems addressed by this CR/PR are that ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor is
> both ill-suited for many (if not most) of its applications, and is a
> performance
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:56:25 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> ForkJoinPool20Test::testFixedDelaySequence is failing intermittently. The
> assert that checks that the periodically tasks only executes 8 times is
> removed, it may run more than this before it cancelled.
Yes, the bound is no longer guara
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 09:11:00 GMT, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
>> Please review a tiny fix in the ForkJoinPool. Since JDK 9 (JDK-8134852 [1])
>> in one case when TC subfield in ctl field is decremented, the applied
>> masking (UMASK, upper bits) may not preserve neighbor RC subfield sometimes.
>> In J
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 19:29:53 GMT, Simon Hartley wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address review comments
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinP
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:27:30 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Personally I think it's worth it. @AlanBateman, what do you think?
>
> Right now it's hard to envisage needing to have >2B delayed tasks queued.
> Maybe in a few years we might regret this. So maybe better to change it to
> return long, I
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:17:32 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> The schedule(Runnable ..) and schedule(Callable ..) methods are a single
>> sentence in the interface. The ForkJoinPool methods has more to say about
>> cancellation and shutdown. So while it could inherit, doesn't
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:14:08 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 49 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319447
>>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:23:12 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> The commonPool can't be shutdown (both shutdown methods are specified to
>> have no effect on the common pool) so I suppose it doesn't really matter.
>
> Heh, that's a fair point, Alan. :)
Clarified:
* Arranges that scheduled tasks t
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:12:47 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 49 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319447
>>
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:05:46 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The pull request now contains 49 commits:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8319447
>>
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:06:30 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 3507:
>>
>>> 3505:
>>> 3506: /**
>>> 3507: * Submits a one-shot task that becomes enabled after the given
>>
>> If the javadoc for the new methods from the
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls whe
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:41:41 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:40:57 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:38:55 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:40:08 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:35:52 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:30:22 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 15:14:56 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 47
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls whe
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:17:29 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Use SharedSecrets for ThreadLocalRandomProbe; other tweaks
>
> src/java.base/share/class
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 13:46:52 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 1301:
>>
>>> 1299: if ((room == 0 ||// pad if no caller-run
>>> 1300: a[m & (s - ((internal || task == null ||
>>> 1301:
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:34:00 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Maybe it's worth using java.time.Duration, although it doesn't fit into the
>> API very elegantly.
>
>> I wonder if the variance of the Consumer to this method should be more
>> permissible. Something like:
>>
>> public ForkJoinTask submi
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls whe
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 15:49:26 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Reduce volatile reads
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/DelaySche
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:26:48 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> (Copied from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319447)
>>
>> The problems addressed by this CR/PR are that ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor is
>> both ill-suited for many (if not most) of its applications, and is a
&
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 13:30:56 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 3131:
>>
>>> 3129: if ((p = (cp = common).parallelism) < 2)
>>> 3130: U.compareAndSetInt(cp, PARALLELISM, p, 2);
>>> 3131: return cp;
>>
>
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:13:12 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurre
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:42:01 GMT, Sunmisc Unsafe wrote:
>> Is it possible to use getAndSet instead of cas-loop on #pend?
>>
>> final Task t = tail.getAndSet(task);
>> t.next = task;
>>
>> but that would require a new head field to bypass, probably not worth the
>> gamble if the footprint incre
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:23:07 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/ForkJoinPool2
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:21:56 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/ForkJoinPool2
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:06:31 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/ForkJoinPool2
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:04:20 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> test/jdk/java/util/concurrent/tck/ForkJoinPool2
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:51:29 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurren
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:46:07 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurren
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:37:49 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Standardize parameter checking
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/DelaySc
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:30:11 GMT, Doug Lea wrote:
>> (Copied from https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8319447)
>>
>> The problems addressed by this CR/PR are that ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor is
>> both ill-suited for many (if not most) of its applications, and is a
&
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
way that could be extracted
> out into (package-private) interfaces if another j.u.c pool type is
> introduced.
>
> Only one of the policy controls in ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor applies to
> ForkJoinPools with DelaySchedulers: new method cancelDelayedTasksOnShutdown
> controls
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:10:24 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:16:55 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java li
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:38:00 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java lin
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:23:23 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinP
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:11:31 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 16:52:41 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Address feedback
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinT
1 - 100 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
