On Thu, 15 May 2025 13:49:14 GMT, Arno Zeller wrote:
> When the test java/io/File/GetXSpace.java fails, because the usable space is
> greater than the free space, the values in the exception are not the correct
> ones.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f8fc7e
On Mon, 19 May 2025 20:19:25 GMT, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
> @ArnoZeller Please issue the `/integrate` command so that this request may be
> sponsored.
Thanks for reviewing!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25250#issuecomment-2893448783
When the test java/io/File/GetXSpace.java fails, because the usable space is
greater than the free space, the values in the exception are not the correct
ones.
-
Commit messages:
- Use correct variables.
Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25250/files
Webrev: https://webre
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 19:00:56 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>> Make tools/jpackage/share/ErrorTest.java test safely handle the case when
>> native bundling is unavailable on the test host.
>>
>> Additionally:
>> - If native bundling is unavailable on the test host, PackageTest will
>> throw `jtre
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:02:05 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Make tools/jpackage/share/ErrorTest.java test safely handle the case when
> native bundling is unavailable on the test host.
>
> Additionally:
> - If native bundling is unavailable on the test host, PackageTest will throw
> `jtreg.Ski
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:02:05 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Make tools/jpackage/share/ErrorTest.java test safely handle the case when
> native bundling is unavailable on the test host.
>
> Additionally:
> - If native bundling is unavailable on the test host, PackageTest will throw
> `jtreg.Ski
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 08:32:20 GMT, Christoph Langer wrote:
>> On Windows, the test java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java can fail when run
>> as user that is member of the Administrators group. In that case new files
>> are not owned by the user but instead by BUILTIN\ADMINISTRATORS. This breaks
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:58:37 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Yes, I think using System.getProperty("user.name") is brittle as well. If
>> we'd use `com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem`, we would introduce the
>> dependency to another module - `jdk.security.auth`. Not sure, whether this
>> is a go
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 07:47:19 GMT, Arno Zeller wrote:
>> test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java line 304:
>>
>>> 302: if (Platform.isWindows() &&
>>> "BUILTIN\\Administrators".equals(whoami)) {
>>> 303:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 18:33:01 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> On Windows, the test java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java can fail when run
>> as user that is member of the Administrators group. In that case new files
>> are not owned by the user but instead by BUILTIN\ADMINISTRATORS. This breaks
>>
10 matches
Mail list logo
