On Fri, 9 May 2025 07:35:41 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
> JDK-8318650 introduced hotspot intrinsification of subword gather load APIs
> for X86 platforms [1]. However, the current implementation is not optimal for
> AArch64 SVE platform, which natively supports vector instructions for subword
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 02:05:06 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> @XiaohongGong I quickly scanned the patch, it looks good to me too. I'm
>> submitting some internal testing now, to make sure our extended testing does
>> not break on integration. Should take about 24h.
>
> Hi @eme64 , may I ask how the
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 10:08:23 GMT, erifan wrote:
>> This patch optimizes the following patterns:
>> For integer types:
>>
>> (XorV (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (Replicate -1))
>> => (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 ncond)
>> (XorVMask (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond) (MaskAll m1))
>> => (VectorMa
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:16:48 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> JDK-8318650 introduced hotspot intrinsification of subword gather load APIs
>> for X86 platforms [1]. However, the current implementation is not optimal
>> for AArch64 SVE platform, which natively supports vector instructions for
>> sub
On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 03:05:15 GMT, Mohamed Issa wrote:
> The goal of this PR is to implement an x86_64 intrinsic for
> java.lang.Math.sinh() using libm. There is a new set of micro-benchmarks are
> included to check the performance of specific input value ranges to help
> prevent regressions in
The goal of this PR is to implement an x86_64 intrinsic for
java.lang.Math.sinh() using libm. There is a new set of micro-benchmarks are
included to check the performance of specific input value ranges to help
prevent regressions in the future.
The command to run all range specific micro-benchm
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 09:49:46 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
> Proxy currently places proxy classes that proxy interfaces with
> package-private return types in dynamic modules. This means that if a return
> value is non-null, Proxy cannot return it and throws IllegalAccessError.
>
> This patch changes
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:24:22 GMT, Emanuel Peter wrote:
>>> Agree with Paul, these are minor regressions. Let us proceed with this
>>> patch.
>>
>> Thanks so much for your review @sviswa7 !
>
> @XiaohongGong I quickly scanned the patch, it looks good to me too. I'm
> submitting some internal tes
On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 18:32:56 GMT, ExE Boss wrote:
>> Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Test to verify observed internal unsafe behaviors
>
> test/jdk/jdk/internal/misc/Unsafe/AddressComputationContractTest.java li
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 18:41:27 GMT, Chen Liang wrote:
>> Unsafe throws IAE for misusing static vs instance fields, and it's revealed
>> that AtomicXxxFieldUpdaters are using this mechanism to reject static
>> fields. This is not a good practice, but we can at least document this so we
>> don't ac
10 matches
Mail list logo
